facebook twitter instagram linkedin google youtube vimeo tumblr yelp rss email podcast phone blog search brokercheck brokercheck Play Pause

Stocks Remain Stuck In Neutral And That's Ok

The S&P 500 plunged -4.25% this week with Friday's close at 5,408.42. The index opened lower to start the week, and the weekly open recorded as the weekly high, so the price action this week was all downhill, literally.

The S&P 500 traded lower each and every day Tuesday through Friday, with the index falling -2.11% on Tuesday and -1.73% on Friday. We've used a football analogy each of our last few Updates illustrating how the S&P 500 was knocking on the door of the end zone, retesting all-time highs and in position to "score" or break out to the upside. Well, if it was 1st-and- goal at the 1-yard line last Sunday, then we got a holding penalty this past week. Back it up 10 yards, S&P 500.

This week's move lower perpetuates the trading range we discussed in our Update from August 11:

"Trading ranges are notoriously difficult to forecast, mostly because any and all price action confined within the range always comes with a "yea, but..." or an asterisk. In other words, the S&P 500 can't resume a primary uptrend on its daily chart until the index breaks out to new all-time highs above the ~5,670 level (solid red line), and the world can't go back to ending like it was on Monday until the S&P 500 breaks down below the ~5,119 level (solid blue line).

The price action confined between these two levels is noise, not signal, no matter how loud the noises get. Should the S&P 500 trade all the way back to the ~5,500 level this week, we'll still say "yea, but...". A "retest" has to happen, no matter whether it's retesting this week's low in the 5,100s or retesting our all-time highs in the 5,600s. The market can't receive a pass or fail grade until the test occurs! Now, with the Volatility Index (VIX) finishing the week at 20.37 the S&P 500 is still expected to move up/down by more than 1% on a daily basis, so the expected price action inside the range is likely going to be wild. Naturally, the seat belt light remains on."

Clearly the first retest of our all-time highs received a failing grade.

However, this week's downside reversal doesn't mean we can't retake the test at some point in the future, and it doesn't mean we're destined to break down below support in the low 5,100s either.

This week's downside reversal leaves the S&P 500 in no-man's-land, squarely back in the middle of the range, meaning the price action from here reverts to being viewed as noise, not signal. We're back to "yea, but..." until we take our next test, no matter whether that's retesting our all-time highs in the 5,600s or our recent swing low in the 5,100s. Should we kick off next week moving back to the north, perhaps trading back toward the ~5,500 level, we'll say "yea, but...". If we find negative momentum into tomorrow, perhaps trading down into the ~5,300s, we'll say "yea, but...". 

The main point is the S&P 500 is stuck, consolidating and correcting through time, which is natural, normal and healthy given the index's trailing returns the last 12 and 24 months, which currently sit at 26.13% and 50.84% respectively.

We continue to believe we have a strong fourth quarter year-end rally in our future, but we're not in the fourth quarter yet!

Fundamentally, the picture is a bit cloudy at the moment. The labor market continues to show some cracks (click here), Friday's jobs report didn't exactly stem concerns regarding the unintended consequences excessively tight monetary policy is having on the labor market. With the Fed ready to pivot but there still being uncertainty as to the size of the first rate cut on 9/18 (i.e., -0.25% or -.50%), the market seems to be struggling to discount whether or not the Fed's pivot is arriving a few minutes late or a few hours late.

As of Friday's close, market participants are only pricing in a -0.25% rate cut on the 18th, which appears to be in line with the Fedspeak we heard on Friday (click here). Interestingly, the market is pricing in a -0.50% rate cut in November, which is something we find curious since we'd vote for the opposite (-0.50% rate cut in September, -0.25% cut in November).

If the bond market could speak it would be screaming at the Fed to cut rates.

Yields on the short end of the curve have absolutely plunged over the last two months. The yield on a 1-year Treasury bond closed Friday at 4.09%...it was above 5% in early July! The yield on a 2-year Treasury bond, often viewed as the best proxy for where the federal funds rate should be set, closed Friday at 3.65%. That implies the Fed is too tight by more than 1.50%! The bond market appears to have conviction that the Fed is behind the curve and that's why bond prices are surging in the present, helping balanced and diversified portfolios outperform during recent equity market weakness.

The iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond Index Fund (TLT) closed higher by 3.52% this week with Friday's close at $99.56. Friday's close is the highest weekly close for TLT thus far in 2024 and has TLT retesting "resistance" dating back to late 2022 and early 2023. We struggle to believe TLT will break out above this "resistance" on its first attempt.


Market internals have an decidedly "defensive" tone of late too.

Consumer staples, real estate and utilities all outperformed this week and have been three of the top four performing sectors within the S&P 500 over the last three months. Meanwhile, the technology sector has been the worst performing sector within the S&P 500 the last three months, falling -5.05%.

This has helped market breadth in the sense that more broad and balanced indices have outperformed; the S&P 500 Equal Weight Index (SPXEW) is higher by more than 4% over the last 12 weeks while the S&P 500 itself is negative over the same time span. But improving market breadth at the expense of weakness from the biggest and most influential sectors is not a great trade. It's like the Lakers' role players catching fire while Lebron James goes ice cold - they're not going to win many games! 

Moving forward, it's imperative the S&P 500 technology sector (SPT) regains its mojo. SPT was down a massive -7.06% this week and appears headed to a retest of the ~3,700 level. Remember, we recently wrote that every "W" begins as a "V" and the chart of SPT looks like it's in the process of turning the "V" into a "W".


As for the week ahead, we'll get inflation data on Wednesday and Thursday and we're not expecting anything "hot". It will be interesting to see how the market trades if we do get more relatively "cool" inflation data. Once upon a time we'd write that the Fed's primary mandate is to "inflate or die", which was tongue-in-cheek about how the Fed will generally do whatever it takes to avoid a deflationary wave putting a stranglehold on the economy.

However, at this stage of the cycle, weaker than expected inflation data could stoke fears of a deflationary pulse, meaning market sentiment could skew toward "risk-off" given the dichotomy between a a deflationary pulse and just a -0.25% rate cut. To be blunt, the Fed wins its battle against inflation only if inflation is stable around their mandate of 2%! If the Fed stayed too tight for too long and now we have zero inflation, or worst of all a deflationary pulse, then all bets are off as to where the price of the S&P 500 will trade to over the coming months. Remember, the Fed's trying to thread the needle, so we need inflation data that's not too hot and not too cold! Another exciting week awaits!


S&P 500 Primary Trend - Up

Our work continues to label the primary trend as up, or bullish. During uptrends, investors are generally best served maintaining an equity overweight across their asset allocation and relying mostly on passive investing methodologies. It's not until the primary trend can be labeled down, or bearish, where investors should "rebalance" their portfolio in an effort to manage the risks associated with a "bear market" for the S&P 500. Following a plan of this nature will provide investors a method to identify whatever pitch the market throws, whether it's a fastball down the middle (uptrends) or a nasty 12-6 curveball (downtrends), and adjust their swing accordingly.

Since breaking out to the upside in July, the S&P 500 has been consolidating and mostly trading sideways. We've used this analogy a lot over the years, but given the sprint higher the S&P 500 embarked on from April's bottom up into July's peak near ~5,700, the index needed to catch its breath.

Prices don't move linearly forever, and the index gained nearly 15% in a straight line from April's low to July's high. Ironically, the month of September is still currently an "inside month", meaning our monthly high is below August's high and our monthly low is above August's low. We do not expect this to continue throughout the remainder of the month, but anything is always possible.

Back in July we wrote:

"We can all now draw a horizontal line across the 5,667.20 level. This is the highest daily close in the history of the S&P 500 and it's where "resistance" revealed itself. From a retracement perspective, we'd love to see the S&P 500 trade down into the 5,300s, but ideally not next week. Consolidating between ~5,300 and ~5,700 over the remainder of the third quarter would be ideal."

We're essentially there - the S&P 500 has been consolidating almost all of the third quarter.

We think the S&P 500's battery is almost recharged. Simply put, we think the S&P 500's consolidation the last two months is healthy regarding the outlook for the remainder of 2024.

As for the fourth quarter of 2024, it's very rare for calendar years that demonstrate this much strength through the first eight months of the year to simply fall flat on their face the remainder of the year.

Reference back to the table we shared in last week's Update.

As always, long-term investors have to decide what risks they're willing to accept across their portfolio. Broadly speaking, it boils down to the decision to risk money (i.e., invest in something that's not principally protected in exchange for potential meaningful return on investment) or risk opportunity (i.e., invest in something that is principally protected and lose the potential to earn meaningful return on investment).

The easy decision as of today is to "take the money and run" - it's easy to want to sell it all and hang out in short-term Treasury bills paying 4% per year interest. It's much harder to hang in there and have faith in the idea of a strong fourth quarter. In the investing world, and life in general, it's the harder path that's typically more rewarding!

Happy Sunday!

Steve & Rick



This material is being provided for client and prospective client informational purposes only. This commentary represents the current market views of the author, and Nerad + Deppe Wealth Management (NDWM, LLC) in general, and there is no guarantee that any forecasts made will come to pass. Due to various risks and uncertainties, actual events, results or performance may differ materially from those reflected or contemplated in any forward-looking statements. Neither the information nor the opinions expressed herein constitutes an offer or solicitation to buy or sell any specific security, or to make any investment decisions. The opinions are based on market conditions as of the date of publication and are subject to change. All data is sourced to stooq.com and stockcharts.com. No obligation is undertaken to update any information, data or material contained herein. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Any specific security or strategy is subject to a unique due diligence process, and not all diligence is executed in the same manner. All investments are subject to a degree of risk, and alternative investments and strategies are subject to a set of unique risks. No level of due diligence mitigates all risk, and does not eliminate market risk, failure, default, or fraud. It should not be assumed that any of the securities transactions or holdings discussed were or will prove to be profitable, or that the investment recommendations or decisions we make in the future will be profitable, or will equal the investment performance of the securities discussed herein. The commentary may utilize index returns, and you cannot invest directly into an index without incurring fees and expenses of investment in a security or other instrument. In addition, performance does not account other factors that would impact actual trading, including but not limited to account fees, custody, and advisory or management fees, as applicable. All of these fees and expenses would reduce the rate of return on investment. The content may include links to third party sites that are not affiliated with NDWM, LLC. While we believe the materials to be reliable, we have not independently verified the accuracy of the contents of the website, and therefore can't attest to the accuracy of any data, statements, or opinions.


Financial Advisor Websites by Twenty Over Ten Powered by Twenty Over Ten