The S&P 500 gained 2.45% this week with Friday's close at 3,351.28.
The index opened near the low of the week (3,284.53), closed near the high of the week (3,352.54), and actually increased every single day this week thanks mostly to a strong final hour of trading on Friday. Friday's close is the second highest weekly close in the history of the index, which has now increased five of the last six weeks. If it was 3rd-and-goal from the 1-inch yard line last week, the bulls put the ball in the endzone this week. Broadly speaking, the S&P 500 appears to be breaking out from a near two-month period of consolidation.
We're now in position to retest our all-time highs at 3,386.15 (closing basis) and 3,393.52 (anytime price). If you told us on March 22nd that we'd be typing this in August of 2020 we'd have answered with "no way". And yet, here we are. The price of the S&P 500 trades beyond the limits of imagination.
There's only one known level of resistance left on the charts, the rest are just speculative, but the last hurdle is always supposed to be the most difficult one.
Given the S&P 500's propensity to travel to price levels where the largest number of transactions will occur, we'll be fairly surprised if the S&P 500 doesn't trade up to all-time highs over the week ahead.
This isn't exactly a bold call as 3,386 is only 1% above Friday's close at 3,351.
The key question for the short and intermediate term is whether or not the S&P 500 will then stay above 3,386. It's one thing to set a new all-time high, or trade slightly above 3,393.52. It's another thing to sustain a trade above 3,393.52. Given the polarizing nature of 3,393.52, we'd be absolutely stunned if the S&P 500 stays above 3,393.52 on its first attempt. When the bulls score a touchdown, it's usually the bears ball after kickoff.
However, the bears can go 3 and out, meaning the S&P 500 doesn't experience any real meaningful pullback off its first retest of 3,393.52, and instead takes a brief pause at resistance and then blows right through it. Or, the bears can get a few first downs, analogous to a -2% or -3% pullback for the S&P 500. Sometimes, the bears even establish long drives, and score some points, analogous to a -5%-10% pullback or correction for the S&P 500 after briefly trading above 3,393.52. Double top chart formations are well known and respected for a reason, and in this case it can't be ruled out at this point (we can never be sure we made it over the last hurdle until we land safely over the last hurdle!).
We do have some short-term headwinds in front of us as we head into the week ahead, which furthers our view that the index will have trouble sustaining at the ~3,400 marker.
For starters, the S&P 500 has closed higher six trading days in a row, and prices don't move linearly forever. Second, there are measures of sentiment that are at extremes. For example, the CBOE Put/Call Ratio (CPC) closed this week at just 0.73 with a weekly high at just 0.74.
Since 2009 (an era where stock prices have mostly only gone up), we've only seen 9 other calendar weeks where the weekly high for CPC was below 0.80. This annotates calendar weeks where participants, collectively, had far more desire to transact in call options than put options. Interestingly, the S&P 500's forward 3-week returns have closed lower seven of nine instances. Four of the nine samples even marked the highest weekly close for the S&P 500 over the forward one month. While this is a crime of small numbers, and lacks any semblance of significance, it does set a behavioral precedent whereby when participants shun put options, and behave as if "stocks only go up", the price of the S&P 500 usually heads to the south shortly thereafter.
As we look to the week ahead, Trump made headlines on Saturday by signing a few executive orders (click here). Whether this has traction or is just a political ploy is anyone's guess, but perhaps this will help catapult the S&P 500 to a rather euphoric open, an open that leaves us face-to-face with all-time highs on Monday. The trillion- dollar question is: Will the index stay then stay there for the remainder of August? We believe the answer is most likely no.
S&P 500 Primary Trend - Up
Our work labels the primary trend for the S&P 500 as up or "bullish". During uptrends, long-term investors are best served with an equity overweight across their asset allocation and relying mostly on passive investing methodologies.
The name of our game in long-term investing is to "know when to hold 'em" and "know when to fold 'em".
Broadly speaking, the idea is to "hold 'em" during uptrends and "fold 'em" when evidence suggests the price of the S&P 500 is in a downtrend. This will pair together strong returns during uptrends with the trade-off being paying the price of false positives, or folding 'em when there was actually a decent hand in the near future. However, it's not a wise decision to stop wearing a seat belt because the seat belt locks down far more often than it actually needs to lock down.
For now, the offense is on the field, and it appears to be a time to "hold 'em", even if things get bumpy in August and no matter how counterintuitive that may seem given the state of the economy. In fact, the counterintuitiveness is probably helpful to the idea of a continued uptrend into the future. Downtrends tend to evolve when we're all convinced they won't evolve. Uptrends tend to extend when we're convinced they can't extend. It's why they say bull markets love to climb the "wall of worry", and the "wall" is gigantic at the moment.
From a momentum perspective, the S&P 500 is on a four-month winning streak. We've written a lot over the years about the magic of five-month winning streaks, and a positive return for the month of August will bring some magic into the equation. However, it is interesting to note that the S&P 500's forward twelve-month returns following a four-month winning streak spanning across the months of April through July have never been lower. The index has closed the following July higher all 11 instances for average returns of 15.17%.
As always, we can't use the past to consistently predict the future, the game's just not that easy. In the event the S&P 500 closes the month of July 2021 higher than the month of July in 2020 it will be a pure coincidence, a matter of correlation, not causation, dating back to its four-month winning streak from April of 2020 through July of 2020. However, the point of any analysis is only to help an investor make an informed decision, it's not to predict the underlying price of an asset. The adults in the room know predicting the price of an underlying asset is an exercise in futility.
Take Warren Buffett's investment in Apple, which he's absolutely hit a home run on (click here). Buffet didn't have any magical analysis that could predict the price of Apple, but he had analysis that suggested Apple would likely be a sound investment into the future. The same is true regarding the table above; it doesn't predict the price of the S&P 500 over the forward one year, but it suggests that the index will likely be a sound investment into the future.
At the moment, perhaps the biggest impact the table above can have for long-term investors is to help them stay the course with their long-term investing plan.
It's imperative long-term investors do not let the fear of striking out keep them from playing their game. Given the chaos across the world at the moment, it's easy for someone to want to deviate from their long-term investing plan. It's easy to understand why many want to sell it all and move to cash. It's easy to feel like "we're doomed".
Gold Goes 9 For 9, But Turbulence Is Expected
Gold gained 2.12% this week with Friday's close at $2,028. Gold has now increased nine weeks in a row and Friday's close is a new all-time high weekly close. However, the metal declined -2% on Friday, ending its 15-day winning streak as measured by the continuous futures contract (not the exchange-traded fund). Perhaps the metal is finally ready to take a breather over the week(s) ahead.
Gold has essentially traded from $1,671 to $2,089.20 without any interruption, with the bulk of the gains all coming in the last three weeks (gold has gained 12.04% the last three weeks).
We never truly know why an asset prices the way it does, but it would stand to reason that gold's run these last three weeks has a relationship with both a collapsing United States Dollar Index (USD) and collapsing interest rates.
The USD has fallen six of the past seven weeks and traded down to levels not seen since 2018. USD did manage to gain 0.10% this week, narrowly avoiding a seven- week losing streak. For as "overbought" as gold is, is as "oversold" as the USD is/was on its daily chart. Any upward reversion for USD is likely a driver of selling pressure for gold, so it's no coincidence that gold declined -2% on Friday with USD gaining 0.69%, its best day since early June. USD has at least placed a temporary bottom on the chart below at 92.79. It's easy to envision further USD strength over the short term, which should land USD at the ~94-96 region over the weeks ahead.
Interest rates have also been collapsing. The yield on a 10-year United States Treasury bond (UST10y) has fallen from a June high at 0.91% to an August low of 0.52%. However, UST10y left the appearance of a "double bottom" on the chart this week, turning to the north from the 0.52% level just as it did in March when it turned to the north at the 0.54% level. Any continued upward momentum for UST10y will also create a headwind for gold, and it's easy to envision UST10y trading into the 0.60-0.70% region over the week ahead.
Putting it all together, it's at least easy to envision mean reversion for gold over the weeks ahead.
Prices don't move linearly forever and the linearity of gold's sprint to the north, combined with the linearity of USD and UST10y's decline, leave conditions ripe for a reversal.
That said, we believe this reversal will only be temporary and interrupt the primary trends established for gold, USD, and UST10y. In other words, we believe gold will continue to trend higher over time, even if there's short term weakness, and the USD and UST10y will continue to head lower, or at best trade sideways, over time. Negative real rates are here to stay and will probably only worsen if the Fed, and global central banks, get their way. And what better way for the United States to handle its debt crisis than to strive to devalue its currency? While we're half kidding here, currency devaluation in response to a debt crisis is the oldest trick in the book.
We continue to believe that gold remains a prudent hedge and sound component of a diversified portfolio for most long-term investors.
This material is being provided for client and prospective client informational purposes only. This commentary represents the current market views of the author, and Nerad + Deppe Wealth Management (NDWM, LLC) in general, and there is no guarantee that any forecasts made will come to pass. Due to various risks and uncertainties, actual events, results or performance may differ materially from those reflected or contemplated in any forward-looking statements. Neither the information nor the opinions expressed herein constitutes an offer or solicitation to buy or sell any specific security, or to make any investment decisions. The opinions are based on market conditions as of the date of publication and are subject to change. All data is sourced to stooq.com and stockcharts.com. No obligation is undertaken to update any information, data or material contained herein. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Any specific security or strategy is subject to a unique due diligence process, and not all diligence is executed in the same manner. All investments are subject to a degree of risk, and alternative investments and strategies are subject to a set of unique risks. No level of due diligence mitigates all risk, and does not eliminate market risk, failure, default, or fraud. It should not be assumed that any of the securities transactions or holdings discussed were or will prove to be profitable, or that the investment recommendations or decisions we make in the future will be profitable, or will equal the investment performance of the securities discussed herein. The commentary may utilize index returns, and you cannot invest directly into an index without incurring fees and expenses of investment in a security or other instrument. In addition, performance does not account other factors that would impact actual trading, including but not limited to account fees, custody, and advisory or management fees, as applicable. All of these fees and expenses would reduce the rate of return on investment. The content may include links to third party sites that are not affiliated with NDWM, LLC. While we believe the materials to be reliable, we have not independently verified the accuracy of the contents of the website, and therefore can't attest to the accuracy of any data, statements, or opinions.